

Freelancers working with international clients often share the same goal: send professional invoices and get paid globally without setting up a company. Remoly and Ruul both aim to solve this problem, but they take slightly different approaches.
| Aspect | Remoly | Ruul |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Freelancers planning to grow | Solo freelancers |
| Company required | No | No |
| Invoicing | Yes | Yes |
| Global payments | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing style | Service-based | Pay-as-you-go |
| Setup complexity | Simple | Very simple |
Both platforms allow freelancers to issue professional invoices to international clients without registering a legal entity.
Ruul focuses on speed and simplicity. Creating and sending an invoice is quick, and clients can pay through a single payment link. This works well for freelancers who want a clean, no-friction workflow.
Remoly offers a more flexible invoicing setup. Invoices integrate closely with its payment accounts, making it easier to manage recurring work, multiple clients, or different currencies over time.
Ruul acts as a merchant of record. Your client pays Ruul, and you withdraw your earnings after the service fee. The process is straightforward and designed to minimize admin work for freelancers.
Remoly provides broader payment options, including multi-currency balances and global payout methods. This can be useful if you work with clients across regions or want more control over when and how you receive funds.
Pricing structure is one of the main differences.
Ruul follows a clear pay-as-you-go model. There are no monthly fees — you pay a percentage when an invoice is paid. This is attractive for freelancers with irregular income or project-based work.
Remoly uses a service-based pricing approach. Basic invoicing is lightweight, while additional payment features may come with extra costs. This model suits freelancers who value flexibility and expect their invoicing needs to evolve.
If simplicity is your top priority, Ruul feels very intuitive. You can start invoicing quickly with minimal setup and almost no learning curve.
Remoly requires slightly more setup but offers more control in return. It’s a better fit if you want your invoicing tool to grow with you as your freelance work becomes more structured.
| Feature | Remoly | Ruul |
|---|---|---|
| No company required | Yes | Yes |
| Freelancer invoicing | Yes | Yes |
| Pay-as-you-go | Depends on service | Yes |
| Multi-currency payments | Strong | Standard |
| Client payment methods | Multiple | Multiple |
| Suitable for long-term growth | Yes | Limited |
Choose Ruul if you:
Choose Remoly if you:
Remoly and Ruul both help freelancers invoice clients globally without setting up a company. Ruul keeps things simple and lightweight. Remoly offers more flexibility and room to grow. The right choice depends on whether you value speed today or flexibility for tomorrow.





Easy to start,
intuitive to use





